What Is The Best Home Theater Screen Color
The inquiry
- Why you should trust us
- Who this is for
- How we picked
- How we tested
- Our choice: Silver Ticket STR Series
- Flaws only non dealbreakers
- Long-term examination notes
- Runner-up: Elite Screens SableFrame 2
- A DIY option: Goo Systems GooToob
- Lots more information
- What does "authentic" actually mean?
- The competition
- Footnotes
- Sources
Why you should trust us
I've been reviewing displays and projectors since 2008. I'yard ISF certified to get the best out of any display device and have all the NIST-certified equipment to measure whatever Boob tube, projector, or screen that comes along.
Who this is for
If you lot accept a projector, yous should get a screen. Most modern projectors are bright enough to throw a decent image on just about whatever shut-enough-to-white surface, but if yous're withal using a white-painted wall, you really should upgrade. A screen has less texture and will show more than accurate colors, plus add together popular to the paradigm, since pigment volition almost e'er reflect less light than a screen (meaning the epitome will appear dimmer than is ideal).
But if you lot ask a home theater expert or aficionado what to choose, more ofttimes than non, they'll recommend something that costs more the projector itself. Our pick is aimed more than at someone looking to put together a casual home theater on a budget or just wanting to upgrade from a living room wall. A good screen can last a long time, and then it's worth investing enough money to get something that's piece of cake to set and offers decent performance.
For most people, it's not worth paying significantly more than than a few hundred dollars since you'd need a high-end, properly calibrated projector to exist able to perceive any noticeable performance gains. But if yous take a high-terminate projector and want to get the about out of your setup, the reference screen nosotros used for our testing, the Stewart StudioTek 130, has long been an industry standard.
Regardless of how much yous spend, know that screen technology is not some fast-moving tech sector like smartphones or tablets. The screen you buy today volition likely last through multiple projectors earlier needing replacement. For example, Stewart has made the StudioTek 130 for more a decade with diverse incremental upgrades. Many professional reviewers take used the StudioTek 130 since the age of CRT projectors, and it still holds upward today.
If you already take a project screen that isn't fabricated of blackout textilei and uses a real screen material, you're probably OK and don't need to get out and buy a new screen. Merely if you want to go larger, every bit the latest projectors are bright enough to back up larger images, it's worth because a new screen.
How we picked
Dissimilar TVs, projectors are actually i part of a multipart system. The screen, room, and projector all play a part in the final image yous see. A projector can be perfectly accurate (more on this below), just the image can still look incorrect because of how the screen is affecting it. The chief factors we considered when testing a project screen were: proceeds, color accuracy, viewing angle, and texture.
Gain is a measurement of how much light the screen reflects. A gain of 1.0 means it reflects the same amount of light as an industry standard white magnesium-oxide lath. Screens can reflect less light and accept a gain of less than 1.0, or more light and have a gain college than ane.0. A lower gain will produce deeper, darker blacks but reduce overall image brightness. In the early days of digital project, this was useful because projectors had terrible (read: grayish) blacks. Just that is less of an result now with about decent projectors.
A higher gain, made possible by special screen materials, reflects more low-cal back toward the center of the room. This creates a brighter image, only it also reduces viewing angles and can introduce hot spots (areas of the image that are noticeably brighter than other areas). It used to be that a college gain was necessary, simply as projectors have gotten more powerful, today a gain of 1.0 is often sufficient.
Color accurateness measures how well the screen reflects the colors projected onto it. The makeup of the screen can result in certain colors existence absorbed more than than others and introduce a tint to the image that isn't coming from the projector. Many projectors ship with picture modes that are shut to accurate out of the box, only those might no longer be accurate after they striking the screen. A screen that introduces as footling color shifting as possible is ideal. The two images below show the same image on two unlike screen materials. Y'all can easily see the color shifts between the 2 and the issues a screen tin introduce.
Viewing angles influence how wide you can sit down from the center of the screen before the calorie-free noticeably drops off. With a gain of 1.0, the viewing angle can exist close to 180 degrees, since it reflects everything more or less equally in all directions. With a higher gain, the viewing angle gets smaller, as you are in essence "focusing" the reflected light more toward the center of the room. With a high-gain screen, you'll want to put seats closer to the center of the screen.
The texture of the screen also impacts how much detail y'all can come across. If a screen's texture is evident from a usual seating altitude, it volition alter the image quality and mayhap your enjoyment. If the screen textile is very fine, then you lot will non meet any texture from a normal viewing altitude, and then the paradigm appears smooth.
About all of the screen reviews out there are of expensive screens, then nosotros had to get-go from scratch. I offset went to the AccuCal Project Screen Fabric Report. W. Jeff Maier of AccuCal has tested samples of many screen materials using loftier-end equipment to determine their colour accuracy and bodily gain. Since he is dealing with just samples of the materials (frequently 8½- past eleven-inch pieces) that he is sent through the mail, the report doesn't become into construction or installation of the screens themselves.
Next, my inquiry turned to the primary AVSForum and other resource. Hither the screen conversations range from the peak-of-the-line Stewart to a DIY option for $3 from Abode Depot. There are also many pocket-sized Internet Straight companies that would otherwise go unnoticed without discussions at AVS and other locations.
Nosotros also pored over reviews from Amazon, making sure to advisedly read what people really complained most. I besides talked to other reviewers and calibrators to find out what they might take used and seen in their work that impressed them, even if they had not formally reviewed that detail screen.
After all that, we prepare out to review 100-inch, 16:9 screens, every bit close to 1.0 gain as possible. We figured this was a good-size, average screen that would work for most people. You can certainly go larger, though the image will be dimmer (by an amount equal to the increase in screen surface area). Since most modern habitation theater projectors won't have an consequence creating a bright image on a 100-inch screen (and most can even do larger), we didn't feel annihilation higher than a 1.0 gain was necessary. Since about content is 16:ix, that was too our preferred screen shape, though many companies brand 2.35:ane-shaped screens likewise.
We didn't exam pull-down screens or ambient-light-rejecting materials unless we already had a sample around. Those are more than specialized cases, and we were looking for the screen that would be all-time for the greatest number of people in a semi-permanent home setting.
So to sum up, we were looking for a roughly 100-inch, 1.0-gain, 16:nine screen that had very petty color shift, no noticeable texture, good viewing angles, and easy installation and setup—and, ideally, was very inexpensive. With that in mind, we ended upward bringing in the Silver Ticket STR Series 100″, the Elite Screens SableFrame 2 100″ in CineWhite, the 100-inch Stewart StudioTek 130 and Cima Neve 1.1 screens, 3 120-inch screen materials (blackout fabric, FlexiWhite, and FlexiGray) from Carl's Place, Wilsonart Designer White laminate in an 8- by four-foot sheet, Goo Systems' Screen Goo Reference White and GooToob, and Home Depot'due south Behr Silver Screen. I also included in the testing my personal screen, a 122-inch Screen Innovations SolarHD 4K.
The Stewart and Screen Innovations screens are much more expensive models that are oft sold simply through custom AV retailers, but we even so included them in our tests as references for comparison. Stewart is the best-selling screen brand for custom home theaters, and the StudioTek 130 is the company'south best-selling material. It is the reference standard for a dwelling house theater screen and the one most reviewers are likely to recommend if you ask for a unmarried proffer; I use it when testing projectors. In our tests of screens, we wanted to make sure to pit everything against this reference to encounter how well they performed.
How we tested
To test the contenders, every screen was assembled and tested in my dwelling house theater room. I used an Epson 5020UBe projector combined with a Lumagen Radiance 2021 video processor to make the projected image as close to reference accurate every bit possible. Using a spectrometer and a colorimeter along with Portrait Displays Calman color calibration software, I measured the images off the lens, then off the screen, to see how much of a color shift each screen introduced, and to calculate the gain. A variety of content was viewed on each screen to await for sparkles, hot spots, texture, or other issues.
The most common flaw with the screens we tested is that they introduce a blue tint to the projected image. A bluish-white looks brighter than a neutral D65 white (the correct white betoken for home video content). If you see two screens side by side and one looks brighter, you frequently tin't tell which one is "correct," but your eye will tend to prefer the brighter 1. If you're looking at i screen by itself, your eyes and brain will adapt to the incorrect paradigm and assume it is correct. This blue tint was nowadays in all the cheaper screens, which use similar materials, so one with a minimal amount is what we looked for. Check out What is accurate? below for more info.
Our selection: Argent Ticket STR Series
Our pick
The Silverish Ticket STR Serial screen is the best because it has proficient image quality that introduces only a small amount of tint, information technology's piece of cake to build and very affordable, and information technology just manifestly looks nice. Unless you want to spend a lot of fourth dimension on a DIY project, or are willing to spend a ton more than money, you lot but aren't going to do better for a basic screen than the Silverish Ticket.
At its current cost of about $200 for a 100-inch 16:9 screen with white material, the Silvery Ticket is the cheapest overall option tested for a prebuilt screen, simply it performs equally well as options that cost upwards to vii times as much. Moving upward to a 120-inch model adds $50, and at that place are many other sizes available from 92 inches upwards to 200 inches. It is also available in ii.35:one aspect ratios for people who want the CinemaScope experience at dwelling.
The image on the Silver Ticket is very good for non merely its relatively inexpensive cost, just also any toll, period. With content through the Epson, the screen does a very good job of showing the detail and texture in a 1080p epitome. The material itself has neither sparkles nor hot spots during viewing, and information technology has a very wide viewing angle. It does introduce a bit of bluish tint to the image, merely less than other screens exercise. To nigh people information technology will not exist visible. It maintains the dissimilarity ratio of the Epson projector and looks much better than any cheaper material. The Stewart screens are the only ones made of materials that offer a articulate step up from the Argent Ticket line, but they as well cost seven to 12 times as much.
In real world use, the Silver Ticket just looks good. While watching Skyfall or Harry Potter or Star Trek on it, I never felt that I was missing anything from the motion picture. The images consistently announced precipitous and show the texture of a suit or the wrinkles in skin. Even while sitting at the edge of the screen, I was still able to see a very skillful moving picture void of any additional color shift. The Silver Ticket screen produces an impressive epitome, and I'd exist happy to recommend information technology to friends and family unit.
Assembling the Silver Ticket is as well an like shooting fish in a barrel chore. The top and bottom rails are in 2 pieces to make aircraft easier, and putting them together is not difficult. It took me xxx minutes full to assemble the screen, which is one of the quickest times of any screen tested.
I didn't need help from anyone else to build or hang it, proof that it can exist done solo. The rod tension system keeps the screen taut, and you won't exist caught blasphemous and sweating heavily while building it (which cannot be said about every screen project).
Once the screen is hung on the wall in that location is no visible flex in the summit or bottom rail, and it looks well made. Past comparison, the Elite Screens SableFrame model costs more for the aforementioned size and offers like operation, but I ended up with hobbling thumbs after spending almost three times as long to build it. The result was similar, but it took more attempt and time to go there.
Equally far as objective measurements go, we fabricated more than a k measurements per screen and have consolidated the data into a table below. We go into farther particular in the Lots more data department for those who are interested. While some screens mensurate better than the Argent Ticket, they are either seven times more than expensive or time-intensive DIY projects, which most people aren't upwards for.
I calculated a gain for the Argent Ticket of around 0.95 compared to our NIST reference measurement, which is all you need for a modern projector. Though, it should be noted that it falls brusque of its claimed gain of ane.1. Information technology likewise had exceptional color accuracy.
| Grayscale dE2000 | Saturations dE2000 | ColorChecker dE2000 | Average dE2000 | |
| Reference | i.41 | 1.01 | 1.66 | i.36 |
| GooToob | 1.08 | ane.57 | two.24 | 1.63 |
| StudioTek 130 | 1.61 | one.42 | 2.09 | 1.vii |
| SI SolarHD | 2.49 | 1.76 | 2.three | 2.18 |
| Cima Neve | ii.84 | 1.76 | two.25 | 2.28 |
| Argent Ticket | 2.96 | 1.99 | 2.37 | 2.44 |
| Goo Paint | ii.91 | ii.04 | 2.26 | ii.4 |
| Carl's FlexiWhite | 3.21 | 2.32 | 2.72 | 2.75 |
| Elite CineWhite | 3.13 | 2.67 | 3.two | iii |
| Behr Silver Screen | iii.88 | 2.92 | ii.viii | 3.2 |
| Wilsonart Designer White | 4.eleven | ii.79 | two.86 | 3.25 |
Error levels betwixt the projector (reference) and the screens. An ideal screen will produce the exact same numbers as the reference. Whatsoever difference means the screen is affecting the colour of the reflected paradigm. Numbers use the Delta Eastward 2000 formula, where lower is better. Measurement data from Calman 5.3.6 provided past Portrait Displays.
For its cost, the Argent Ticket provides footling reason to build your own screen instead of ownership ane that y'all can assemble yourself and hang in less than an 60 minutes. Building your own screen with blackout cloth, woods, and felt tin can easily cost $100 if yous already ain all the tools you need (staple gun, saw), and it tin can't be taken autonomously later or moved easily. The modest savings aren't worth it in comparing, peculiarly when the paradigm quality volition likely be worse overall.
Flaws but not dealbreakers
The color of the Silver Ticket is not perfectly neutral. The Goo Systems GooToob is more than neutral, every bit is our reference Stewart screen. But everything else nosotros tested, including my personal $2,700 screen, had a color tint equal to or worse than the Silvery Ticket's. The tint information technology introduces is depression enough that, with most projectors, it won't be noticeable to the naked eye. I paired it with my calibrated projector and had no color tint issues while watching existent globe content.
When the frame sits apartment on the ground, there is a scrap of flex in the meridian bar. Companies like Stewart and Screen Innovations use single-piece top and bottom bars, but those are far more expensive to purchase and send, and are almost impossible to get down some staircases. Once hung on the wall, the frame of the Silverish Ticket is perfectly flat and this isn't an event.
When the lights are up and I look in the lower-right corner, the screen fabric isn't perfectly taut. When watching a movie or Television show, I never noticed information technology, but I did with the lights on. Nearly of the other assembled screens don't suffer from this, but I never saw it during an actual viewing, so I'1000 really not concerned about it.
Long-term test notes
I've been using our option since fall 2014, and it has held upwardly simply fine. I've used multiple projectors with it without an issue, taken information technology down for a move, and built it back upwards once more with no problems at all.
Runner-up: Elite Screens SableFrame two
Runner-upwardly
If the Silvery Ticket is sold out, the Elite Screens SableFrame two is a suitable replacement. It sells for a bit more than money, and the assembly is harder, only the screens' performance levels are very close. The surfaces of the screens are close to identical, the primary departure beingness in how the screens attach to the frames. The Silver Ticket comes together much more than easily, and although the material doesn't look as taut as Elite Screens' model during use, there is no functional difference.
A DIY option: Goo Systems GooToob
Likewise great
Goo Systems GooToob
The DIY route
The GooToob offered the best measured functioning of any screen we tested, regardless of price, just is a huge hurting to install and nearly impossible to move.
Buying Options
If you are OK with a semi-DIY arroyo, Goo Systems' GooToob system delivered the best color accuracy of whatever screen textile we tested. The package includes a rolled canvass of paper that tin can brand a screen as big equally 128 inches in a 16:9 format. If you want something smaller, or even a different aspect ratio, you can trim the screen to a more appropriate size. Everything you need to attach it to the wall is included, forth with gloves for handling it and a felt border for the edge.
Once I had it upwards, the GooToob presented an nearly flawless image, with practically no color shift, an even gain (0.95 every bit measured, very shut to the ane.0 it's rated at), and a very pleasing surface overall. It offers up a screen surface that fifty-fifty the most disquisitional viewer would exist happy with.
Information technology won't exist the all-time pick for anybody, however, considering you can't hands install it past yourself. You as well have to attach information technology to the wall, so if you move to another business firm or fifty-fifty change the location of your projector, it volition hateful starting all over (and transferring information technology to a new wall is not easy). It costs the same as the 120-inch version of the Silver Ticket and offers a ameliorate prototype, merely it is harder to prepare up and install.
Lots more data
We pulled out far more information from the Calman colour measurement software than just the numbers presented above. Everything is compared to the low-cal directly from our reference projector, the Epson 5020UBe, calibrated off the lens using an i1Pro Spectrometer. Calibrating straight from the lens prevents the screen or room from interfering with the measurements and shows what the projector tin can actually do. The RGB rest of the projector can exist seen below. What nosotros want is every bar to exist at 100 with as niggling divergence from that equally possible.
Charts beneath evidence the RGB balance for the StudioTek 130, then our favorite overall screen, the Silver Ticket, and for comparison the Wilsonart Designer White, one of the DIY materials.
Every bit you tin can meet, the Stewart tracks very close to the Epson projector, while the Silver Ticket adds a blue tint to bright images past absorbing some blood-red and dark-green light, but this isn't actually noticeable to the naked eye unless yous have the reference screen next to information technology for a direct comparison. The Designer White, on the other hand, adds a lot of blue that'southward piece of cake to see with the naked eye. The screen surfaces are actually irresolute the image from the projector, so an image that might exist accurate out of the projector is no longer accurate one time it hits the screen. This is merely looking at the grayscale, but similar issues happen with color, as we'll see.
Here is the chart for colour saturation errors for the Epson projector. This measures the 6 primary and secondary colors at 10 brightness intervals to see how well it displays different shades of those colors. This gives us 62 data points, including black and white, to measure out accurateness. With this chart we want every bar to exist as depression as possible. Any measurements less than three.0 (indicated past the greenish line in the charts below) are considered invisible to the naked eye, then if we stay below that information technology should look perfect.
Bated from an issue as it reaches 100%, these numbers are right where we want them to exist. Everything coming out of the Epson lens has an fault level so low that you cannot come across it with your eyes. Below are the results for the StudioTek 130, the Silver Ticket, and the Wilsonart. Measurements for the GooToob paper are at the bottom.
Again, the Stewart has no equal when information technology comes to a regular project screen for color accurateness. Information technology is the almost expensive screen in the testing, but information technology does measurably and visibly outperform everything else. The Silver Ticket has larger errors, merely very few of them get close to the green line that indicates a visible mistake. On the Designer White there are clearly visible issues in cyan all across the spectrum, and visible errors on the lower percentage saturations in other colors. The GooToob is also effectively perfect here.
Information technology is important to keep in mind that our starting point here is a projector calibrated with a $2,500 video processor, $3,000 in equipment, and $1,500 in software. Most projectors offset out closer to the iii.0 line—usually by it—than at the depression level we did. The errors introduced by the screen are going to compound with inaccuracies in the projector, which will cause more colors to look more than wrong than they did in our testing (which started with a best-instance scenario).
Since nigh people exercise non calibrate their projector only, hopefully, utilize the most accurate mode mentioned in reviews of information technology, having a screen that doesn't alter that epitome (i.due east., make it worse) is important. A calibrator with tools can gear up the projector to account for the tint of a screen, but that's an extra $300 to $500 expense afterwards you buy the screen.
Equally far as gain goes, the Elite CineWhite and Stewart Cima Neve come in at 1.1 gain, compared to our NIST reference, while the StudioTek 130 is right at ane.3. The everyman gain is the Behr Argent Screen paint, at 0.48, and the Screen Goo paint, at 0.66. The pigment numbers are very low and you'll need a bright projector for those to look presentable. The other gains are all close enough to 1.0 or across that with any electric current projector they will look very bright.
What does "authentic" actually mean?
When nosotros talk well-nigh an authentic projector, we are targeting a specific level of performance. When you think of HDTV or Ultra Hd, yous likely think in terms of pixel count. While this is the well-nigh recognizable specification for these technologies, there are many more behind them—color, for example, and others.
The importance here is that you lot run across on your screen what the creators of your content intended you to see. Look at the original Matrix flick which has a green tint to the virtual world scenes and a more saturated, natural colour scheme to the real world images. With an incorrect prototype, storytelling cues like this are lost, since yous don't see what the director had intended you lot to see. Phone call us video purists, but we prefer authentic images over inaccurate. Since the Silver Ticket is very neutral and costs less than the competition, there's no tradeoff. If you want to accommodate your projector to look differently from accurate, the Argent Ticket will reverberate back to you any you want.
HDTV color temperature and colour points (explained below) are defined by the Rec. 709 specification. Amongst the specifications nosotros target with an accurate projector are:
- White indicate or "color temperature": This is literally the colour of white that you lot come across on screen. White can range from bluish white to reddish white. The HDTV specification dictates a very exact neutral white. HDTV and UHD use D65 as the color temperature for white, which is based on the midday dominicus in the Northern Hemisphere. If you're used to the Cool or Dynamic setting on your Boob tube, D65 will likely seem red. It's actually neutral, and the Absurd setting is bluish, fooling your eye.
- Color points: The colors the human eye can see are divers by the CIE 1931 chart, but no TV or projector can brandish all of those. We don't accept the technology today to prove all the shades of red, green, blueish, and other colors you see in nature. Because of this, we fix a target for what these colors are in movies and TV shows and have brandish devices employ those. Otherwise the content would look completely unlike depending on what you lot watched information technology on. If a device can't show all of these colors, or shows colors past them, the resulting image will look dissimilar from what it is supposed to. This chart shows the HDTV colour points within of the CIE 1931 diagram.
- Gamma: The idea behind gamma is that your center perceives changes in light levels in a non-linear style. If you accept 255 light bulbs in a room, going from i light on to 2 lights is a much larger deviation to your eye than going from 235 lights to 236. The gamma curve in a brandish accounts for this, making it and then every incremental step is visible to you. There is no actual gamma standard for HDTV content, and people take dissimilar opinions about the correct one, but being able to choose one is of import, and having a screen that doesn't modify the projector's settings is ideal.
A screen has to enable a projector that is accurate, to remain authentic. If it throws off the gamma, adjusts the white betoken, or tin't reverberate the full color spectrum, then information technology will exist incapable of producing an authentic epitome no matter what projector you have.
That's 1 of the main reasons we like the Silver Ticket and GooToob—they're inexpensive, but go out the epitome from the projector lone (at to the lowest degree more than almost inexpensive screens).
The competition
The Stewart Cima line is the company's most affordable line, and the Neve one.1 material is the closest product to the Silver Ticket. Information technology as well measures superbly but costs about seven times more than the Silver Ticket. The StudioTek 130 has the actress gain and pop that brand it wait better in apply, and the GooToob offers almost identical performance at a fraction of the toll. It is a very good screen, just others offer more value or improve operation.
The Screen Innovations SolarHD 4K material is a direct competitor to the StudioTek 130 and my personal screen. In measurements it comes up curt compared with the StudioTek, with a bluish tint, while costing almost as much. The measured functioning isn't good plenty to recommend information technology over our choices. If yous want a premium screen, you should pay the extra for the StudioTek 130.
Screen Materials from Carl's Identify are the top sellers at Amazon, but there are better options. The blackout fabric looks very poor when compared with a real screen material, and has a low gain and a noticeable texture to it. The FlexiGray material adds too much of a bluish tint, even more the white surfaces nosotros tested, but does improve black levels. The darker base of operations colour makes the blacks from our Epson projector inkier simply dims whites and adds that blueish tint. The FlexiWhite has like measurements to our pick, just isn't as piece of cake to setup. You demand to build your own frame, using hardware from Home Depot, and it doesn't await nearly as overnice and professional as the Silver Ticket does. You get a larger screen, and it will piece of work well outside as it'southward easy to suspension autonomously and move, but I wouldn't put it in my home theater room.
Goo Systems's Screen Goo comes in many varieties. While testing the Reference White, I found information technology has a blue tint compared with the GooToob, and it'southward harder to install than a screen. Painting a screen means sanding a wall to exist perfectly flat and free of any texture, and then spraying multiple coats of paint. If you don't own a paint sprayer information technology'south another piece of hardware to purchase (or rent), and one you might non utilize again. If you ever movement you have to pigment the wall again. Hanging a screen leaves just two holes in the wall that are relatively easy to patch. If the performance offered a huge benefit over that of a screen it might be worth the effort, but we don't call up it is.
Behr Silver Screen is a paint you tin pick upwardly from Habitation Depot. It is past far the cheapest option. Painting this onto a two-foot-square section of drywall I found it to exist very low gain, offering forty% less brightness than our picks. Unlike some of the other low-proceeds options, it didn't do much to improve blackness levels either. The image has a very bad color tint, and it only doesn't impress.
Wilsonart Designer White is a laminate meant for putting on article of furniture and other uses, but it has found a niche in the home theater world. It offers more gain and pop than the GooToob only has the worst measurements of everything we tested. If your local Dwelling Depot or other store stocks it, you tin can build a 94- to 96-inch screen for $90 without a edge. Y'all add together a edge and some hardware to attach it to the wall, hassle with everything involved ... and wish you lot had simply picked the easier, higher quality Silver Ticket in the starting time identify.
Some people are using spandex materials for a screen equally it is something yous can have downward hands and is supposedly acoustically transparent for placing speakers behind it. Since we are looking at permanent screens neither of these benefits applied here, so nosotros didn't test it out.
Da-Lite makes screens and is 2d to Stewart when it comes to top screens for custom installers. Their most affordable 100-inch xvi:9 screen with textile is close to $500, making it besides expensive to compete with our picks, and their high-finish materials rival Stewart in price.
Footnotes
Sources
-
W. Jeff Meier, Projection Screen Cloth Report, AccuCal , June 4, 2014
-
Projector Screen Discussions, AVS Forum
-
Thomas J. Norton, Screen Innovations Slate Projection Screen, Sound & Vision , September 25, 2014
What Is The Best Home Theater Screen Color,
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-projector-screen/
Posted by: morganmoseng.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Is The Best Home Theater Screen Color"
Post a Comment